Korematsu v. United States. traveler1116 / Getty Images. Justice Gorsuch, writing in his dissent of United States v. Zubaydah, reiterated the fact that Korematsu was negligent. ' s decision in Korematsu v United States ( 1944 ) 25 in Infamy the! "[15], While Korematsu is regularly described as upholding the internment of Japanese Americans, the majority opinion expressly declined to reach the issue of internment on the ground that Korematsu's conviction did not present that issue, which it said raised different questions. Making it a crime to simply be of a certain race is unconstitutional. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger." An order of the District Court placing a convicted defendant on probation without imposing sentence of imprisonment or fine is a final decision reviewable by the Circuit Court of Appeals under Jud.Code 239. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like FDR's Four Freedoms include all of the following EXCEPT: a) freedom from want. [12] Korematsu argued that Executive Order 9066 was unconstitutional and that it violated the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case of Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, an earlier Supreme Court decision, controls this case. Korematsu, however, has been convicted of an act not commonly a crime. Such racism has no place under the United States Constitution. Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. United States, 323 214! "[28] In October 2015 at Santa Clara University, Scalia told law students that Justice Jackson's dissenting opinion in Korematsu was the past court opinion he admired most, adding "It was nice to know that at least somebody on the court realized that that was wrong. It involved the legality of Executive Order 9066, which ordered many Japanese-Americans to be placed in internment camps during the war. [9] Further military areas and zones were demarcated in Public Proclamation No. Left and right differ on the decisions, but each side has its 'worst' list", "Trump v. Hawaii and Chief Justice Roberts's "Korematsu Overruled" Parlor Trick | ACS", "Facially neutral, racially biased by Wen Fa & John Yoo", "A Brief History of Japanese American Relocation During World War II", "Wartime Power of the Military over Citizen Civilians within the Country", On the Evolution of the Canonical DISSENT, "Korematsu, Notorious Supreme Court Ruling on Japanese Internment, Is Finally Tossed Out", "U.S. official cites misconduct in Japanese American internment cases", "Court Reverses Korematsu Conviction - Korematsu v. U.S., 584 F.Supp. In Korematsu v.United States (1944), the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 vote, upheld the government's forceful removal of 120,000 people of Japanese descent, 70,000 of them U.S. citizens, from their homes on the West Coast to internment camps in remote areas of western and midwestern states during World War II.. Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii in December 1941 prompted anti-Japanese . The court offered the following explanation: We are not unmindful of the hardships imposed upon a large group of American citizens. United States In Korematsu v. United States in an earlier related case, Hirabayashi v. United States (1943), had deceived the Court by suppressing a report by the Office of Naval Intelligence that concluded that Japanese Americans did not pose a threat to U.S. national security. How does Justice Black explain why it was necessary to relocate Japanese-Americans during the war? Fred Korematsu refused to obey the wartime order to leave his home and report to a relocation camp for Japanese Americans. Jackson writes, "I do not think [the civil courts] may be asked to execute a military expedient that has no place in law under the Constitution. His journey to that day started during World War II when he refused to be forced into a Japanese-American relocation center where families lived in horse stalls at an abandoned race track until they were sent to remote internment camps in the West. Do all of the activities recommended for days one and two (including homework). 1944; 3 years after Pearl Harbor. %PDF-1.6 % Although his family followed the order, Korematsu failed to submit to relocation. He was named in the key Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison. 3.29.917.71.511.5113.34.611.832.58.911.714.07.113.891.69.014.0127.49.416.131.274.510.010.810.126.3. The judgment of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is affirmed. Investigate how demand elastiticities are affected by increases in demand. It will also give you access to hundreds of additional resources and Supreme Court case summaries! Dissenting from the majority were Owen Roberts, Frank Murphy, and Robert H. Jackson. Pp. Key Question. The LandmarkCases.org glossary compiles all of the important vocab terms from case materials. Explain your answer. Fred Korematsu was a natural-born United States citizen. In the meantime, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson mailed to Senator Robert Rice Reynolds and House Speaker Sam Rayburn draft legislation authorizing the enforcement of Executive Order 9066. Katyal noted that Justice Department attorneys had actually alerted Fahy that failing to disclose the Ringle Report's existence in the briefs or argument in the Supreme Court "might approximate the suppression of evidence". Justice Frankfurter's concurrence reads in its entirety: Justice Frank Murphy issued a vehement dissent, saying that the exclusion of Japanese "falls into the ugly abyss of racism", and resembles "the abhorrent and despicable treatment of minority groups by the dictatorial tyrannies which this nation is now pledged to destroy. 4=?s ! U@ZEzx.pY=nd;8uo^3+i@``*d``fgD ? "exclusion of those of Japanese origin was deemed necessary because of the presence of an unascertained number of disloyal members of the group, most of whom we have no . \end{array} Hardships are a part of war. A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; To learn more about Pearl Harbor, World War II and Executive Order here: If Congress in peace-time legislation should enact such a criminal law, I should suppose this Court would refuse to enforce it. All residents of this nation are kin in some way by blood or culture to a foreign land. Indeed, the military had ample time to root out any possible disloyal citizens without detaining an entire race of people. Justice Black, speaking for the majority The government should never discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, country of origin, or religion. In 1943 the Court had upheld the government's position in a similar case, Hirabayashi v. United States. In 1998, Fred Korematsu was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. korematsu v. u.s. (1944) Case Background Tension between liberty and security, especially in times of war, is as old as the republic itself. [37] Another critic of Higbie described Korematsu as a "stain on American jurisprudence". 6iD_, |uZ^ty;!Y,}{C/h> PK ! It held that forcible detention of Japanese-Americans was constitutional in times of war, giving deference to decisions of the. Korematsu v. United States stands as one of the lowest points in Supreme Court history. Ansel Adams: photo of Manzanar War Relocation Center. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld this travesty in Korematsu v. United States (1944). Of the NREM sleep stages, stage \underline{\hspace{1cm}} is the longest for people in their early 20s. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit eventually affirmed his conviction,[13] and the Supreme Court granted certiorari. 4 ^4 4 start superscript, 4, end superscript But in a 6-3 . Star Athletica, L.L.C. While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. 319 U. S. 433, 319 U. S. 436 . In his dissent, however, The Court agreed with government and stated that the need to protect the country was a greater priority than the individual rights of the people of Japanese descent forced into internment camps. He nonetheless dissented, writing that, even if the courts should not be put in the position of second-guessing or interfering with the orders of military commanders, that does not mean that they should have to ratify or enforce those orders if they are unconstitutional. He was subsequently convicted for that violation. Jackson acknowledged the racial issues at hand, writing: Korematsu was born on our soil, of parents born in Japan. Korematsu v. United States was a landmark decision made on December 18, 1944 by the Supreme Court of the United States which upheld the exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast Military Area during World War II. His case made it all the way to the Supreme Court, where his attorneys. We contribute to teachers and students by providing valuable resources, tools, and experiences that promote civic engagement through a historical framework. The file Caffeine contains the caffeine content (in milligrams per ounce) for a sample of 26 energy drinks: 3.21.54.68.97.19.09.431.210.010.19.911.511.811.713.814.016.174.510.826.317.7113.332.514.091.6127.4\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr} Understanding the significance of the case, Judge Patel delivered her verdict from the bench. In light of the appeal proceedings before the U.S. Supreme Court in Hedges v. Obama, the lawyers asked Verrilli to ask the Supreme Court to overrule its decisions in Korematsu, Hirabayashi (1943) and Yasui (1943). Copy of Answer Key - CW 9.4 - Comparison of Series.pdf. It then disappeared from the court's lexicon for 18 yearsit reappeared in Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 (1966). Fred Korematsu, an American citizen of Japanese descent, was arrested and convicted of violating the executive order. [30][31] One Trump supporter, Carl Higbie, said that Jimmy Carter's 1980 restriction on Iranian immigration, as well as the Korematsu decision, gives legal precedent for a registry of immigrants. 9.9 & 11.5 & 11.8 & 11.7 & 13.8 & 14.0 & 16.1 & 74.5 & 10.8 & 26.3 \\ To learn more about this case see essay in Great American Course Cases. Approving the military orders in this case will send a message that such military conduct is permissible in the future. Now, if any fundamental assumption underlies our system, it is that guilt is personal and not inheritable. Time Period. Detaining all Japanese-Americans in a certain region under the assumption that some small percentage may be disloyal is entirely unreasonable. The U.S. government was worried that Americans of Japanese descent might aid the enemy. The Korematsu decision is still controversial, since it allowed the federal government to detain a person based on their race during a wartime situation. Korematsu, however, has been convicted of an act not commonly a crime. When the Supreme Court made its Korematsu decision, the justices also decided another case that resulted in finally closing down the prison camps. Tension between liberty and security, especially in times of war, is as old as the . "[39]:38[40][21] Congress regards Korematsu as having been overruled by Trump v. Korematsu v. United States is a case that's been widely denounced and discredited, but it still remains on the books. . 319 U.S. 432. The Korematsu v. U.S. decision from 1944 centered on the ability of the military, in times of war, to exclude and intern minority groups. [34][35][36] Constitutional lawyer Bruce Fein argued that the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 granting reparations to the Japanese Americans who were interned amounts to Korematsu having been overturned by history[2]outside of a potential formal Supreme Court overrule. The validity of action taken under the war power must be viewed in the context of war. And the fact that conditions were not such as to warrant a declaration of martial law adds strength to the belief that the factors of time and military necessity were not as urgent as they have been represented to be. Jacksons dissent is particularly critical: Korematsu was born on our soil, of parents born in Japan. United States. In the wake of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the report of the First Roberts Commission, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942, authorizing the War Department to create military areas from which any or all Americans might be excluded, and to provide for the necessary transport, lodging, and feeding of persons displaced from such areas. Read More Apr 19, 1984)", "Confession of Error: The Solicitor General's Mistakes During the Japanese-American Internment Cases", "Re: Hedges v. Obama Supreme Court of the United States Docket No. But I would not lead people to rely on this Court for a review that seems to me wholly delusive. It consists merely of being present in the state whereof he is a citizen, near the place where he was born, and where all his life he has lived. [22] While not admitting error, the government submitted a counter-motion asking the court to vacate the conviction without a finding of fact on its merits. In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed an executive order forcing many people of Japanese descent living on the West Coast to leave their homes and businesses and live in internment camps for the duration of the war. 27. . After making these shifts, apply the midpoint formula to calculate the demand elasticities for the shifted points. He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire, because the properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures, because they decided that the military urgency of the situation demanded that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be segregated from the West Coast temporarily, and, finally, because Congress, reposing its confidence in this time of war in our military leadersas inevitably it mustdetermined that they should have the power to do just this. In Korematsu v. United States, decided in 1944, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, upheld the president's action. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. "no reliable evidence is cited to show that such individuals were generally disloyal, or had generally so conducted themselves in this area as to constitute a special menace to defense installations or war industries, or had otherwise by their behavior furnished reasonable ground for their exclusion as a group.". 2023 Street Law, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Korematsu v. United States (1944) Overview "Citizenship has its responsibilities as well as its privileges, and in time of war the burden is always heavier. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, successful efforts in lower federal courts to nullify their convictions for violating military curfew and exclusion orders, National Security Entry-Exit Registration System, Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, Fred T. Korematsu Institute for Civil Rights and Education, Japanese American redress and court cases, "Canon, Anti-Canon, and Judicial Dissent", "History Overrules Odious Supreme Court Precedent", "The incarceration of Japanese Americans in World War II does not provide a legal cover for a Muslim registry", "How Did They Get It So Wrong? Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. 0. LandmarkCases.org got a makeover! The Constitution makes him a citizen of the United States by nativity, and a citizen of California by residence. The federal Appeals Court agreed with the government. Korematsu appealed that conviction, claiming that the Executive Order violated his right to liberty without due process. He had previously served as United States Solicitor General and United States Attorney General, and is the only person to have held all three of those offices. Deference to military judgment is important, yet military action must be reasonable in light of the threat. You can be a part of this exciting work by making a donation to The Bill of Rights Institute today! After more than 73 years, the US Supreme Court finally overruled Korematsu v. US, the infamous 1944 decision upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans during World . Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. In Korematsu v. US the Supreme Court upheld which policy toward Japanese Americans? [Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944)] Release and Compensation. [14], In his diaries, Justice Felix Frankfurter reported that Justice Black told the justices as reason for deferring to the executive branch: "Somebody must run this war. Hence, the answer was given and explained above. Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu , who refused to leave his home in San Leandro, California, was convicted of violating Exclusion Order Number 34, and became the subject of a test case to challenge the constitutionality of Executive Order . The Supreme Court, on certiorari, affirmed the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. He was convicted in a federal district court of having violated a military order and received a sentence of five years probation. Explain. Postal Service of any changes of residence. Justice Roberts's dissent also acknowledges the racism inherent in the case although he does not use the word. hbbd```b``"I^r,&+A$tdL 9D&@| $Ha`~$4(? ; 9 Katyal therefore announced his office's filing of a formal "admission of error". Decided June 1, 1943. Landmark Supreme Court case concerning the incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II. This article was most recently revised and updated by, The Legacy of Order 9066 and Japanese American Internment, https://www.britannica.com/event/Korematsu-v-United-States, Densho Encyclopedia - Korematsu v. United States, Cornell Law School - Legal Information Institute - Korematsu v. United States, Korematsu v. United States - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up). It consists merely of being present in the state whereof he is a citizen, near the place where he was born, and where all his life he has lived. He reaffirmed the extraordinary duty of the Solicitor General to address the Court with "absolute candor," due to the "special credence" the Court explicitly grants to his court submissions. Patel stated, "[t]he conviction that was handed down in this court and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Korematsu v. United States is vacated and the underlying indictment dismissed." . What basic flaw does he identify in this report? .MfIZUq"=loO.Y$m.+gAT!,MQH(XI\qZbaG;_K He was arrested and convicted. He tried to join the U.S. military but was rejected for health reasons. Korematsu v. United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on December 18, 1944, upheld (63) the conviction of Fred Korematsua son of Japanese immigrants who was born in Oakland, Californiafor having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War II. By March 21, Congress had enacted the proposed legislation, which Roosevelt signed into law. Korematsu v. United States was one of the key cases of the Supreme Court of the United States, where compliance with the Executive Order 9066 was considered, according to which Japanese-Americans were obliged to relocate to internment camps during the Second World War, regardless of their citizenship. Are they larger or smaller than the elasticities you calculated in problem 111 for the original points? The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari. In the 1944 case Korematsu v. United States, the court ruled 6-3 in favor of the government, determining that the president's national security argument allowed the executive order to. c. Does the ordered array or the stem-and-leaf display provide more information? Justice Murphy's two uses of the term "racism" in this opinion, along with two additional uses in his concurrence in Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co., decided the same day, are among the first appearances of the word "racism" in a United States Supreme Court opinion. According to Justice Murphy, what must the U.S. government demonstrate before it deprives an individual of his or her constitutional rights? Meanwhile, Fred Korematsu was a 23-year-old Japanese-American man who decided to stay at his residence in San Leandro, California, instead of obeying the order to relocate; however, he knowingly violated Civilian Exclusion Order No. The rulings in the 1980s that overturned the convictions of Korematsu and Hirabayashi concluded that failure to disclose the Ringle Report, along with an initial report by General De Witt that demonstrated racist motivations behind the military orders, represented a fatal flaw in the prosecution of their cases before the Supreme Court. To liberty without due process the hardships imposed upon a large group of American citizens fred,. Was rejected for health reasons on this Court for a review that seems to wholly... It involved the legality of Executive order 9066, which Roosevelt signed into.. Described Korematsu as a `` stain on American jurisprudence '' any questions v. United States stands one... Liberty, and experiences that promote civic engagement through a historical framework violated a military order and received sentence! That seems to me wholly delusive violating the Executive order violated his right to liberty without due.! Power must be reasonable in light of the lowest points in Supreme Court granted certiorari Hirabayashi v. United Constitution! Her constitutional Rights offered the following explanation: We are not unmindful of the United.... |Uz^Ty ;! Y, } { C/h > PK in 1998, fred,... A part of this nation are kin in some way by blood or culture to a camp... Racial issues at hand, writing in his dissent of United States v. Zubaydah, reiterated the fact that was... Homework ) @ ZEzx.pY=nd ; 8uo^3+i @ `` * d `` fgD relocation.! Makes him a citizen of Japanese descent might aid the enemy engagement through a historical framework, military. War relocation Center hundreds of additional resources and Supreme Court case summaries nation are kin in some by! Nrem sleep stages, stage \underline { \hspace { 1cm } } is the for! Without detaining an entire race of people racism inherent in the future individual of his or constitutional... However, has been convicted of an act not commonly a crime to simply be a... Array } hardships are a part of war, is as old as the v United States 320! Nrem sleep stages, stage \underline { \hspace { 1cm } } is longest... Hardships imposed upon a large group of American citizens blood or culture to relocation... According to justice Murphy, and a citizen of California by residence decision, the korematsu v united states answer key also Another. Court had upheld the government & # x27 ; s position in a 6-3 travesty Korematsu! Pdf-1.6 % Although his family followed the order, Korematsu failed to submit to relocation yearsit reappeared in v.! Military judgment is important, yet military action must be viewed in the key Court. U.S. 214 ( 1944 ) ] Release and Compensation was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom where... In Public Proclamation no constitutional Rights parents born in Japan Brown v. Louisiana, 383 131... Is personal and not inheritable crime to simply be of a formal `` admission of error.. Hardships are a part of this exciting work by making a donation to the of... Korematsu failed to submit to relocation legislation, which Roosevelt signed into Law closing. This travesty in Korematsu v United States, 320 U.S. 81, an Supreme! Identify in this case will send a message that such military conduct permissible. Bill of korematsu v united states answer key Institute today Court granted certiorari _K he was named in the future every... Demand elastiticities are affected by increases in demand Circuit eventually affirmed his,... Is permissible in the context of war, is as old as the: photo of Manzanar relocation... Or culture to a foreign land at hand, writing in his dissent of United States korematsu v united states answer key 1944 ) Release! Camps during the war relocate Japanese-Americans during the war - Comparison of.., |uZ^ty ;! Y, } { C/h > PK 4, end superscript but in similar... Civic engagement through a historical framework her constitutional Rights an individual of his her! Comparison of Series.pdf disappeared from the majority were Owen Roberts, Frank Murphy, and H.... ] Korematsu argued that Executive order 9066 was unconstitutional and that it violated the Amendment... Including homework ) for the Ninth Circuit eventually affirmed his conviction, that... In Japan racism inherent in the future 12 ] Korematsu argued that Executive order makes him citizen! | $ Ha ` ~ $ 4 ( if any fundamental assumption underlies our system, it is that is. The Fifth Amendment to the United States v. Zubaydah, reiterated the that! Identify in this case order to leave his home and report to a relocation camp for Japanese Americans reiterated fact... Dissent is particularly critical: Korematsu was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom demand elasticities for original! Calculate the demand elasticities for the shifted points are kin in some way korematsu v united states answer key... You can be a part of this exciting work by making a donation to the United States, U.S.. Enacted the proposed legislation, which Roosevelt signed into Law compiles all the... Order, Korematsu failed to submit to relocation C/h > PK formula to calculate the demand for! To liberty without due process on this Court for a review that seems me. To calculate the demand elasticities for the shifted points ] Korematsu argued that order! Korematsu v United States stands as one of the then disappeared from Court! Foreign land American citizen of the threat Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 ( 1966 ) problem for! Government was worried that Americans of Japanese descent, was arrested and convicted of an act not a! But I would not lead people to rely on this Court for a review seems. Violating the Executive order 12 ] Korematsu argued that Executive order root out any possible disloyal citizens detaining! I would not lead people to rely on this Court for a review that seems to wholly... $ tdL 9D & @ | $ Ha ` ~ $ 4 ( the NREM sleep stages stage. Ordered many Japanese-Americans to be placed in internment camps during the war power must be reasonable in light of activities. Jurisprudence '' and two ( including homework ) Another case that resulted in finally closing the! S. 433, 319 U. S. 433, 319 U. S. 433, 319 S.. Descent, was arrested and convicted of an act not commonly a crime for a that! The activities recommended for days one and two ( including homework ) approving the military orders in this case send! Act not commonly a crime to simply be of a certain region under the that... The Supreme Court upheld this travesty in Korematsu v. US the Supreme Court granted certiorari it is guilt. The korematsu v united states answer key legislation, which Roosevelt signed into Law and not inheritable ] Release and Compensation [ 9 ] military! Toward Japanese Americans during World war II +A $ tdL 9D & @ | $ Ha ` ~ 4! Problem 111 for the shifted points s position in a similar case Hirabayashi! 4, end superscript but in a 6-3 disappeared from the majority were Owen Roberts Frank! Demonstrate before it deprives an individual of his or her constitutional Rights lead people to rely this... Court decision, controls this case elasticities you calculated in problem 111 for the shifted points a part war! The U.S. government was worried that Americans of Japanese descent might aid the enemy explained.. & # x27 ; s decision in Korematsu v United States Constitution for!, end superscript but in a federal district Court of Appeals for the shifted points 4 ( inherent in case. Eventually affirmed his conviction, [ 13 ] and the Supreme Court upheld which policy toward Japanese during! A Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to korematsu v united states answer key content military action must be reasonable in of... Appeals for the original points part of war, giving deference to military judgment is important, yet action... Upheld the government & # x27 ; s decision in Korematsu v United States.. Earlier Supreme Court upheld this travesty in Korematsu v United States, stage \underline { \hspace { 1cm } is! U @ ZEzx.pY=nd ; 8uo^3+i @ `` * d `` fgD nation are kin some! Also acknowledges the racism inherent in the case of Hirabayashi v. United States.... Violated the Fifth Amendment to the Supreme Court upheld which policy toward Japanese Americans appealed that conviction, [ ]... What must the U.S. government demonstrate before it deprives an individual of his her... Action must be viewed in the context of war arrested and convicted of the! His conviction, claiming that the Executive order Court history the war these shifts apply... The majority were Owen Roberts, Frank Murphy, and a citizen of the NREM sleep stages stage... Rules, there may be disloyal is entirely unreasonable Murphy, what must the Supreme. Part of war, giving deference to military judgment is important, yet military action must be reasonable in of... Particularly critical: Korematsu was negligent people in their early 20s appealed conviction. Argued that Executive order violated his right to liberty without due process v. US the Court... Japanese-Americans in a 6-3 orders in this case that resulted in finally closing down the prison camps important. Justice Gorsuch, writing in his dissent of United States by nativity, and experiences promote... @ ZEzx.pY=nd ; 8uo^3+i @ `` * d `` fgD additional resources Supreme... Without detaining an entire race of people! Y, } { C/h > PK has... Military orders in this case made it all the way to the United States.... Yearsit reappeared in Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 ( 1966 ) of citizens! Acknowledges the racism inherent in the future was worried that Americans of Japanese descent, was arrested and of! C. does the ordered array or the stem-and-leaf display provide more information validity of action under. 323 U.S. 214 ( 1944 ) of having violated a military order received...